Skip Navigation
  • Home
  • About us
  • National sites
  • Myacca
  • Blogs
  • ACCA Discuss
  • ACCA.TV
  • Podcasts
  • Accamail
ACCA - the global body for professional accountants

  • Join Us
  • Students & Affiliates
  • Members
  • Employers
  • Learning Providers
  • General Public
ACCA Homepage < Students < Student Accountant magazine < Archive of past issues < 2006 Archive < April 2006
  • ACCA Qualification
  • CAT Qualification
  • How to pass
  • BSc Degree
  • Career support
  • Cambridge ICFE
  • Diploma in Financial Management
  • Study options
  • Sitting exams
  • Exam results
  • Rules and regulations
  • Student Accountant magazine
  • Student Accountant digital
  • Archive of past issues
  • 2000 Archive
  • 2001 Archive
  • 2002 Archive
  • 2003 Archive
  • 2004 Archive
  • 2005 Archive
  • 2006 Archive
  • January 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • April 2006
  • IRS offers leniency to informer firms
  • It's all about communication
  • 3 things you should know about - continuing professional development
  • Offshore financial centres agree to end VAT abuse
  • Acting responsibly
  • Problem solved - question time
  • News in brief
  • Projected cash flow statements
  • Business strategy and performance models
  • Strategic goals
  • CBI warns government 'Cut tax or lose companies'
  • Degree matters - tips on making a success of your Research and Analysis Project
  • New qualification questions
  • Thinking small(er)
  • Capital investment appraisal
  • Capital allowances for plant and machinery
  • ACCA Careers
  • ACCA calls for anti-corruption strategies in sustainability reports
  • Talking technology - accounting for software
  • Record for reward
  • Clarity
  • May 2006
  • June/July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November/December 2006
  • 2007 Archive
  • 2008 Archive
  • 2009 Archive
  • 2010 Archive
  • Student Accountant direct e-zine
  • FAQs

top stories

  • Registering for exams Registering for exams - opens in a new window
  • Record candidates and improved results in ACCA's latest exam figures Record candidates and improved results in ACCA's latest exam figures - opens in a new window
  • Checked your exam results? Checked your exam results? - opens in a new window
  • Reach your goal Reach your goal - opens in a new window


  • See more news more
    See more features more
Send
Print
Share

Degree matters - tips on making a success of your Research and Analysis Project

30 Mar 2006

Learning Centre
 

John Woodley, ACCA undergraduate programme director at Oxford Brookes University, outlines what makes a good project and also gives some reasons why a project might fail.

Congratulations to the 636 new BSc graduates who were awarded their degree in January 2006. Nearly 3,700 ACCA students, affiliates, and members from over 60 countries have now successfully completed the BSc in Applied Accounting.

The Research and Analysis Project (RAP) is very different to an ACCA written exam. Every project is a separate piece of work. Each student has to identify their own individual project topic, set research objectives, and develop a framework for their project work.

The process of undertaking research, supported by a project mentor, results in two different outputs – the 5,000-word project report and the 1,500-word Key Skills Statement. A student who has passed the RAP has demonstrated competence in a range of skills that are expected of a bachelor-level graduate. These include undertaking research, report writing, listening, questioning, communicating, and reflecting on experiences.

I would like to reassure students and their project mentors that Oxford Brookes makes every effort to ensure that the pass/fail decision on a given RAP is the correct one. Every six months, Oxford Brookes assesses hundreds of unique pieces of work. The marking and moderating processes ensure that a failed RAP has been considered by at least two different people, usually myself and the project external examiner. In the most recent project submission period, Oxford Brookes received 810 projects, of which 636 passed.

There are various reasons I can identify that contributed to the failure of the 174 projects. Some students appear unaware of what is required to pass the RAP, and this comes from not having read the RAP Guidelines. A student needs to read these and to give considerable thought as to what is to be achieved by doing the project work, and how this will be done.

I see project reports that are unstructured and do not provide a coherent link between the project objectives, the information collected, and the accounting or business tools used to analyse the information. It is critical to establish the framework for the project before starting the research work.

Another critical requirement for success is to demonstrate analytical skills. This is more than just reporting or describing what has happened within an organisation, but looking more deeply into the causes of such changes. This may involve looking outside an organisation into the wider business environment.

For example, a very popular project topic is an analysis of the financial position of an organisation. One of the accounting tools used in such projects is financial ratio analysis. Calculating that the gross profit margin has increased from 22.5% to 25% from one year to the next is a starting point for analysis but is not, by itself, sufficient. I want to know why this change has occurred – through higher prices or lower costs or a mixture of both?

I know that obtaining a complete answer may not be easy, but if there is no attempt to link the changes in financial ratios to changes in business activity, the project will not achieve the pass standard. Explain – don’t just calculate, report, or describe.

My final concern is over the failure of students to properly reference their project work. Where the work of another author has been used, then this must be explicitly shown in the project text using the Harvard referencing system. I know that for many students, this may be the first time that they have had to demonstrate this particular academic skill. This is allowed for in the assessment of the project. However, where a marker can’t distinguish the work of a student from that of other authors, the marker cannot make a judgement on the student’s abilities. It is almost inevitable that a poorly-referenced project will not pass. 

On a positive note, the growth in popularity of the BSc in Applied Accounting has been a success for the partnership between ACCA and Oxford Brookes. The University intends to continue this with a revised BSc degree scheme, subject to validation by Oxford Brookes, to incorporate the forthcoming changes in the new ACCA Qualification. Any changes will also take into account the experience gained by having read and assessed over 4,500 RAPs to date. Look out for regular articles on the BSc degree scheme during 2006.

 

Back to top

 
  • Contact us
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility
  • Advertising
  • Site map
© 2010 ACCA