From September 2018 the following changes will apply to APM:
Performance Management (PM) is at the Applied Skills level and tests the candidate's ability in the application and analysis of core management accounting techniques. APM develops key aspects introduced at the PM level, with more of a focus on the synthesis and evaluation of the key topics and techniques. APM also introduces more specialised techniques and current issues in performance management.
The whole of the Performance Management syllabus is assumed knowledge for an Advanced Performance Management candidate. It is unlikely that Performance Management topics will be retested in Advanced Performance Management at the level of detail that is required to pass Performance Management. However, a candidate who does not know the methods and techniques taught for Performance Management will struggle to complete the tasks in Advanced Performance Management, which are to synthesise and evaluate those methods in business scenarios. Refer to the article Bringing forward Performance Management knowledge and skills into Advanced Performance Management.
Technical articles will be used to bring candidates' attention to current topics covered by the syllabus but not mentioned specifically.
Therefore candidates are advised to read our technical articles on performance management in preparing for the exam. Please note that candidates should read technical articles from more than the last couple of years.
This is because performance management moves slowly than say, tax or financial accounting, with trends taking years to build.
EIS refers to the system that is used by the senior executives to plan and control the business. ERPS contains sub-systems with these functions but can also be used to cover the lower-level systems of an organisation.
ERPS is often associated with the move to a single database or data store for the organisation's needs. So, these topics are broadly similar but not exactly the same.
If the question is addressing strategic information needs, then the preference would be to use EIS as it is more precise. If the question is addressing bringing all functional areas into one system and looking at links to suppliers and customers then ERPS would be used.
In so far as stakeholder analysis may prove useful then yes, it is examinable.
Mathematical tables will be provided in the exams (and Annuity tables). Formulae sheet will not be provided with each exam but specific formula will be given where a question requires one.
Formulae will be given for learning curves and Z scores (or any other credit-scoring formulae). WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital) formula will not be given as this is basic knowledge.
Yes, provided these are explained sufficiently in order to allow a marker to see their relevance to the question asked.
Yes, as they are assumed knowledge from the Performance Management syllabus.
This is a core area and Advanced Performance Management will continue to increase its focus on technology, reflecting the impact this is having on the accounting profession and management accounting in particular. The exam may have IT examined in a Section B 25-mark question as in Q3 from the March/June 2017 sample questions, or it could be covered as part of a Section A question, as seen in the March/June 2018 sample questions.
Yes, it is a core area.
There are two articles written by a member of the Advanced Performance Management examining team on this subject on the tehnical articles page. The articles address changes in financial reporting that have affected EVA calculations and will explain in detail what is expected of candidates as a result.
Candidates should be able to perform these adjustments in an EVA calculation and be able to explain why these adjustments are necessary. Q1 part a) in the sample questions published from the September and December 2015 exams is a good example of what is expected
Both models are applicable and questions on this area may allow the use of either or may ask for the use of a particular model.
The implications of a proposed strategy are relevant for Advanced Performance Management because of their impact on the management of performance of the organisation in question.
So a question may ask about how the proposed mission, values or strategies feed into critical success factors and the drivers of performance, and then how these are reflected in the KPIs that are used.
The key questions are about the coherence of these choices, their consistency and the subsequent impact on management activity (ie choice of performance management and measurement systems) in monitoring and controlling the organisation.