Property, plant and equipment exemptions and MPERS

In order to be awarded CPD units you must answer the following five random questions correctly. If you fail the test, please re-read the article before attempting the questions again.

  1. What are the exemptions in Paragraph 35.10 of MPERS that relates to measuring assets (which includes PPE, investment properties and intangible assets) at the date of transition?

  2. If an entity did not elect to use the exemption in paragraph 35.10(d), how would it account for its property, plant and equipment currently stated at revaluation under PERS when transiting to MPERS?

  3. Under the transition exemption of Malaysian Financial Reporting Standards (MFRS), how would a brought forward asset revaluation reserve from the PERS framework be treated upon transition to MPERS

  4. If an entity measures its PPE using a cost model under the existing PERS, it can elect to use fair value as the deemed cost. If an entity uses fair value (upon performing a valuation) as deemed cost for any items, how is the transition to MPERS treated?

  5. There are concerns relating to the revaluation reserve arising from previously revalued property, plant and equipment under PERS that are brought forward on the date of transition to MPERS as the deemed cost. As Section 35 of the MPERS does not provide any explicit prescription on how to deal with this revaluation reserve, how would preparers of MPERS compliant financial statements deal with the revaluation reserve brought forward?