Candidates should spend half their time allocation for the whole exam on the section A and the other half of their time on section B.
A candidate should have an understanding of every element of the syllabus. In the SBR exam, a wide range of syllabus areas are always examined, and it is definitely better to have a broad knowledge of the principles of all of the topics within the syllabus, than to have a detailed knowledge of only a few, and to ignore others.
The SBR syllabus contains very specific guidance about what the examining team considers to be the current issues. Whilst there will be material included in the Approved Content Provider texts relating to these current issues, candidates are encouraged to read widely around these issues. For example, candidates should read journals and periodicals and look at the websites of the International Accounting Standards Board and the 'Big 4' accounting firms (KPMG, PwC, Deloitte, Ernst & Young).
Look out for major issues for users and preparers of financial statements.
Current issues are normally covered by an essay question and therefore if a new accounting standard has been issued then candidates should know the key implications.
If there has been an issue about an accounting standard and an exposure draft or a discussion paper has been issued, then that could be a topic for a question.
Bear in mind that current issues questions do not always deal with specific new standards, or exposure drafts, these questions can also examine any criticisms of existing standards.
Before sitting the SBR exam, candidates should ensure that they have a wide understanding of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS®). They should also understand the principles of the Conceptual Framework For Financial Reporting and be able to apply these principles within the context of an SBR question scenario. Candidates will also require a good working knowledge group accounting and be able to explain their calculations and the rationales behind them.. You may like to set a past FR exam as homework to help them assess their abilities.
The UK version of Strategic Business Reporting will:
We could do although this is unlikely to appear in question 1.
Yes, and it is very important to show clear workings so that markers can give full credit for method, even where some mistakes have been made in calculations..
Although guidance on the starting point under IAS7 is not prescriptive, the suggested solution will follow the illustration within the appendix of the standard and marks will be awarded accordingly.
The current version of the IFRS is examinable if it has been issued before the cut-off date of 1 September, 12 months before the start of the exam year. For example, exams from September 2018 to June 2019 will examine standards in issue as at 1 September 2017.
This will depend on the question, both could be examinable, and this will be clearly stated within the question scenario.
Yes, as long as it illustrates the point the candidate is making and answers the question.
Candidates are given enough information for this not to matter.
No, this would not be examined together in one question. The treatment of the disposal of a foreign subsidiary could be tested as a separate issue.
Yes, but unfortuntely candidates don't do this particularly well. Candidates should also be prepared to explain their reconciliations and other calculations.
Principles (eg substance over form) can be applied to a scenario and don't refer to a particular standard. Rules are contained within standards eg impairment.
Generally, candidates find it hard to differentiate between key rules in the standard and those that are not important.
We have evidence that many candidates do not practise exam questions prior to the exam but simply read the questions and model answers together.
Candidates are advised to practise the questions as if they were sitting the exam.
They should also read the Examiner’s Reports from recent sessions as these contain a great deal of constructive advice for future candidates.
Of course, anything in the answer booklet is marked.
Yes, this is within the syllabus. It is therefore examinable, but unless the question specifically mentions that the entity has made this election, candidates should assume the default position.
Candidates should treat investments in equity instruments within the scope of IFRS9 that are not held for trading as fair value through profit or loss.