This article is relevant to candidates sitting Paper F6 (UK) in either the June or December 2014 sittings, and is based on tax legislation as it applies to the tax year 2013-14 (Finance Act 2013).
Benefits feature regularly in the Paper F6 (UK) exam, although such questions are generally not answered as well as would be expected. The article is not intended to cover every aspect of benefits, but instead mainly covers those areas which are more commonly examined. Motor cars are not covered as they are dealt with in a separate article.
There are four aspects to consider:
During the tax year 2013-14 Prop plc provided three of its employees with living accommodation.
Alex has been provided with living accommodation since 1 January 2011. Prop plc had purchased the property in 2010 for £160,000, and it was valued at £185,000 on 1 January 2011. Improvements costing £13,000 were made to the property during June 2012. The annual value of the property is £9,100.
Bess was provided with living accommodation from 1 January to 5 April 2014. The property is rented by Prop plc at a cost of £2,250 per month, and it has an annual value of £10,400. On 1 January 2014 Prop plc purchased furniture for the property at a cost of £16,200. The company pays for the running costs relating to the property, and for the period 1 January to 5 April 2014 these amounted to £1,900.
Chloe was provided with living accommodation on 6 April 2013, and she lived in the property throughout the tax year 2013-14. The company had purchased the property in 2004 for £89,000, and it was valued at £144,000 on 6 April 2013. The annual value of the property is £4,600.
There is a taxable benefit where an employee is provided with an interest free loan or where the interest rate payable is below the official rate of interest of 4%. There are two alternative methods of calculating the benefit:
The average method: The average is taken of the amount outstanding at the start of the tax year (or when the loan was made if later) and at the end of the tax year (or when the loan was repaid if earlier). The official rate of interest is then applied to this average.
The strict method: The official rate of interest is applied to the amount outstanding on a monthly basis.
If no repayments have been made during the tax year then both methods will produce the same result.
The average method applies unless either the employee or HM Revenue and Customs elects for the strict method. In an exam context, both methods should be calculated even if one party opts for the strict method. However, a question might instruct you to just use the average method, since in reality HM Revenue and Customs only elect for the strict method when it will make a significant difference.
During the tax year 2013-14 Rest Ltd provided three of its employees with loans.
Kim was provided with an interest free loan of £12,000 on 1 June 2013 so that she could purchase a new motor car.
Ming was provided with an interest free loan of £120,000 on 1 May 2013 so that she could purchase a holiday cottage. Ming repaid £50,000 of the loan on 31 July 2013, and repaid the balance of the loan of £70,000 on 31 December 2013.
Newt was provided with a loan during 2011 so that she could purchase a yacht. The amount of loan outstanding at 6 April 2013 was £60,000, and Newt repaid £5,000 of the loan on 31 August 2013, and then repaid a further £5,000 on 28 February 2014. Newt paid loan interest of £970 to Rest Ltd during the tax year 2013-14. The taxable benefit in respect of this loan is calculated using the average method.
The benefit calculated using the average method is £2,533 as follows:
|120,000 + 70,000 x 4% x 8/12|
|120,000 at 4% x 3/12||1,200|
|70,000 at 4% x 5/12||1,167|
|60,000 + 50,000 x 4%|
Where an employee is provided with an asset for their personal use then the benefit is based on 20% of its market value when first provided to the employee (exactly the same as furniture provided along with living accommodation).
If the asset is subsequently sold or given to the employee, then there will be a further benefit being the greater of:
Joe is employed by Firstly plc. On 6 April 2013 the company provided him with a home entertainment system costing £4,400 for his personal use. Firstly plc gave the home entertainment system to Joe on 31 December 2013 for free, although its market value on that date was £3,860.
Generally, the basis for calculating any other benefit is the cost to the employer.
There are various benefits which are exempt or partially exempt. Although correctly identifying the tax treatment of such a benefit may result in only a half mark or one mark, it is important that you correctly identify such benefits so that time is not wasted with unnecessary calculations.
Vary plc provides its employees with various benefits. The benefits were provided throughout the tax year 2013-14 unless otherwise stated.
Denzil was provided with two mobile telephones. The telephones had each cost £250 when purchased by Vary plc in January 2013. The company paid for all of Denzil’s business and private telephone calls.
Emily had her health club membership fee of £710 paid for by Vary plc.
Frederick spent five nights overseas on business for Vary plc. The company paid him a daily allowance of £10 to cover the cost of personal expenses such as telephone calls to his family.
Grace was paid £11,000 towards the cost of her removal expenses when she permanently moved to take up her new employment with Vary plc, as she did not live within a reasonable commuting distance. The £11,000 covered both her removal expenses and the legal costs of acquiring a new main residence.
Hillary’s three year old daughter was provided with a place at Vary plc’s workplace nursery. The total cost to the company of providing this nursery place was £10,800 (240 days at £45 per day).
Ian was provided with 48 weeks of childcare vouchers costing £100 per week. He used the vouchers to provide childcare for his four year old daughter at a registered nursery near to Vary plc’s offices. Ian pays income tax at the basic rate.
June had the use of Vary plc’s company gym which is only open to employees of the company. The cost to Vary plc of providing this benefit to June was £340.
Kristin was provided with free meals in Vary plc’s staff canteen. The total cost of these meals to the company was £1,460. The canteen is available to all of the company’s employees.
Larry regularly works from home two days per week, and was paid an allowance of £192 (48 weeks at £4 per week) to cover the extra light and heat costs that were incurred due to this home working.
There are two further possible adjustments that could apply to most of the benefits that have been covered.
Reduction: The taxable benefit is proportionately reduced if it is only available for part of the tax year.
Contribution: Any contribution made by an employee will reduce the taxable benefit. Contributions are deducted after any reduction has been applied.
Written by a member of the Paper F6 (UK) examining team